Epistemicide. Pt 1

Epistemicide: The Systematic Erasure of Knowledge Systems in History

Introduction

Epistemicide, derived from the Greek episteme (knowledge) and the Latin -cide (killing), refers to the deliberate destruction of knowledge systems. This phenomenon transcends mere censorship; it is an assault on the diversity of human thought, often perpetrated by dominant powers seeking to impose their ideologies. Epistemicide manifests through the erasure of languages, burning of texts, suppression of intellectual traditions, and the silencing of marginalized voices. Its consequences are profound, leading to cultural homogenization, loss of alternative problem-solving approaches, and the reinforcement of oppressive structures. This article explores epistemicide through historical lenses, focusing on Nazi Germany, Augusto Pinochet’s Chile, and colonialism, while acknowledging resistance efforts to reclaim subjugated knowledges.

---

Understanding Epistemicide

Epistemicide is rooted in power imbalances. Portuguese sociologist Boaventura de Sousa Santos describes it as a tool of colonial and authoritarian regimes to establish “monocultures of knowledge,” where only dominant epistemologies survive. Indigenous scholar Linda Tuhiwai Smith links it to colonialism’s “cultural genocide,” where erasing native knowledge facilitated control. Epistemicide operates through:

• Physical Destruction: Burning books, destroying cultural artifacts.
• Institutional Erasure: Dismantling educational systems, banning languages.
• Intellectual Persecution: Targeting scholars, rewriting histories.

By eliminating competing knowledge systems, perpetrators consolidate power, ensuring their narratives dominate. This process is not merely historical; it persists in modern education, academia, and cultural policies.

Nazi Germany: The Erasure of “Degenerate” Knowledge

The Nazi regime (1933–1945) epitomized epistemicide through its systematic campaign to purge Germany of “un-German” thought.

• Book Burnings: In 1933, the Nazi Student Union burned over 25,000 “subversive” books in Berlin, including works by Jewish, Marxist, and pacifist authors like Freud, Marx, and Hemingway. The slogan “Against the un-German spirit!” underscored their aim to obliterate intellectual diversity.
• Persecution of Scholars: Jewish academics, such as Albert Einstein, were expelled, while others, like philosopher Walter Benjamin, fled or were killed. The Frankfurt School, a hub of critical theory, disbanded and relocated.
• Suppression of “Degenerate” Science: The Nazis promoted pseudoscientific racism while condemning “Jewish physics” (e.g., Einstein’s relativity). The Kaiser Wilhelm Institute’s eugenics programs justified genocide.
• Cultural Destruction: The Institut für Sexualwissenschaft, a pioneer in LGBTQ+ research, was raided, its archives burned. “Degenerate art” exhibitions mocked modernist works, confiscating 16,000 pieces.

By annihilating Jewish, queer, and dissident knowledge, the Nazis enforced a fascist epistemology that legitimized genocide.

Pinochet’s Chile: Neoliberalism and the Purge of Dissent

After the 1973 coup, General Augusto Pinochet’s dictatorship (1973–1990) targeted leftist intellectuals to cement a neoliberal order.

• Operation Condor: A transnational campaign to eliminate socialist influence. Thousands of scholars, like economist Orlando Letelier (assassinated in 1976), were disappeared or exiled.
• University Purges: Universities were militarized; 30% of faculty were fired. Social sciences and humanities—seen as “subversive”—were defunded, while economics departments were handed to the “Chicago Boys,” who implemented Milton Friedman’s policies.
• Censorship: Books by Marx, Allende, and Pablo Neruda were burned. Folk singer Víctor Jara, symbolizing cultural resistance, was tortured and killed.
• Neoliberal Epistemicide: Alternative economic theories were suppressed, replacing them with free-market dogma. This shift entrenched inequality, privatized education, and erased collective memory of socialist reforms.

Pinochet’s epistemicide reshaped Chilean society, privileging technocratic knowledge over critical thought.

Colonialism: Erasing Indigenous Epistemes

European colonialism relied on epistemicide to justify exploitation.

• Burning of Codices: Spanish conquistadors destroyed Mayan and Aztec libraries. Only four Mayan codices survive, including the Dresden Codex, salvaged by clandestine preservation.
• Linguicide: Missionaries imposed European languages, eroding indigenous tongues. In Canada and Australia, residential schools punished children for speaking native languages, severing intergenerational knowledge transfer.
• Dismantling Education: British colonizers replaced India’s gurukul system with English-language schools, marginalizing Sanskrit and Persian scholarship.
• Medical Erasure: Traditional healing practices were outlawed. In Africa, colonialists dismissed indigenous agriculture as “primitive,” enforcing cash-crop economies that caused ecological degradation.

Colonial epistemicide facilitated resource extraction by framing indigenous peoples as “uncivilized,” requiring European “enlightenment.”

Resistance and Reclamation

Despite epistemicide, oppressed groups have resiliently preserved knowledge:

• Oral Traditions: Indigenous Australians maintained Dreamtime stories through songlines. The Inca’s quipu (knotted cords) recorded data despite Spanish destruction of written records.
• Hidden Archives: Timbuktu’s manuscripts, detailing African science and philosophy, were saved from Al-Qaeda by librarians in 2012.
• Decolonial Movements: The Zapatistas in Mexico integrate indigenous governance into education. Māori kura kaupapa schools revive language and customs.
• Digital Reclamation: Projects like the Open African Repository digitize endangered texts. Social media platforms amplify marginalized voices.

These efforts challenge epistemic hegemony, fostering an “ecology of knowledges” (Santos) where diverse epistemes coexist.

Conclusion

Epistemicide is a weapon of control, excising histories that challenge dominant narratives. From Nazi book burnings to Pinochet’s neoliberalism and colonial erasures, its legacy is a fractured human heritage. Yet, resistance persists—oral histories endure, archives resurface, and marginalized communities reclaim their epistemes. Recognizing epistemicide’s brutality is the first step toward nurturing a world where knowledge thrives in its plurality. As Santos urges, “There is no global social justice without global cognitive justice.”